Funny books Part I

Comments

Those look good. But you forgot to include "Lamb."

I own two copies of the poodle book, but have read neither. I should get on that.
I didn't include it because it's not actually funny.
Ah yes, I forgot. This is one of those things you insist on remaining wrong about. My mistake. Carry on.
I'm sorry, but Jesus said Fuck is funny once, not for 300 pages. Maybe your skull is just a bit thicker than mine and it took you awhile to get the joke.
I know you like supporting material, so here is a smattering of the professional book critics who agree with me about Lamb.

It's not that I'm dumb, its just that I'm comfortable enough with my own intelligence that I don't feel the need for every book I read to double as billboard that tells the rest of the world how very smart I am.


Booklist - John Green
Although many will find something offensive in this novel, which pokes fun at every major religious tradition that existed in the first century, they will find it simply impossible not to laugh.

Philadelphia Inquirer
Moore’s storytelling style is reminiscent of Vonnegut and Douglas Adams.

Rocky Mountain News
An instant classic...terrific, funny and poignant.


This is one of the most offensive things you've ever posted. Christopher Moore and Vonnegut aren't even from the same planet!

Also, this might come as a surprise to you, but sometimes newspapers are wrong. Lamb = not so funny.
Vonnegut is over-rated.
That may be right. On Moore's planet, people are consistently funny. I'm pretty sure you'd like him better if his books came out on some boutique label, and were mainly read by creative writing majors.
Lamb was not funny, it was episodic and one note. However, I can admit that the last 50 pages were brilliant and the ending was actually very good. It's not that I'm a snob, it's that it wasn't very funny.

And you can trot out the elitist label all you want, but if you actually read the list you'll see that I even included books that were made into movies! Some of them even made the bestsellers list.
You're kidding me, right?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Have you actually read Cat's Cradle?
Of course I have. I read it in high school, when everybody reads Vonnegut. Most people grow out of that phase. I guess you haven't.
I don't believe you. Most people read Slaughterhouse in High School, why did you read Cat's Cradle?
I read Slaughterhouse Five, too. And Breakfast of Champions. I was just like every other teenager who read Vonnegut because I wanted people to think I was a deep and complex individual.
That's where we differ. I read for enjoyment and because it's fulfilling and not because I want to appear a certain way.
Huh. I figured you were a still an angst-ridden teenager. Why else would you read Vonnegut? I didn't realize adults even read that stuff. I always thought of his work like Judy Blume books. They're fine for a certain age group but eventually one moves on.
Well, I haven't read Vonnegut in years, but he is an author I consistently go back to. He's innovative and original, his stories mix the fantastic with the ordinary in a way that not many authors have done since. His stories challenge you to view the world a little differently, and i like that.

I see that you are trying to put me down and make fun of me for still enjoying and endorsing Vonnegut, and I don't care. He was a gifted and brilliant writer and if that makes me a dork or a certain something that you deem 'not cool' or juvenile or whatever it is, so be it.

Good literature like Vonnegut and Judy Blume transcend age and time.
Neither of those wrote "good literature." They wrote simplistic books for children.
What exactly is your definition of good literature then?
Dunno. I haven't stopped to consider how my reading habits are perceived by others in about twenty years, so rather than read the accepted "good literature" I read things I think I'll enjoy. I do know that Vonnegut is the most consistently overrated author out there, though.
What does this have to do with perceived reading habits? Absolutely nothing. If I actually worried about how I was perceived based on my reading habits, I would not spend a good portion of my time reading short stories.

You must have a definition of what you deem good or worthy of your time, what is that. How do you decide what you think you'll enjoy?

As for Vonnegut being overrated, I can't have that argument with you. He's one of those authors I hold close to my heart and I think all the praise that is heaped upon him is totally deserved.
What is this, a bookclub? I like to read things that are cool and don't like to read things that suck.
Sorry, I thought it was an intelligent discussion about books. My mistake for thinking you were capable of such a thing.
Maybe you should have set the tone for an intelligent discussion early on.
Jennifer Government is way too heavy-handed in its anti-Free Market sentiment to be funny. I think Barry does a much better job in Company.

Happiness sounds intriguing and I will add it to my queue.
But see Jennifer Government is about marketing and Company is about corporations. While I enjoyed Company, I thought Jennifer Government and Syrup were way, way better.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Jodi

About Me

Jodi
United States
It's hard to make arrangements around a bittersweetheart
Messaging:
Send
AIM:
GeminiMat
del.icio.us:
jodiwilldare
Goodreads:
42841
Google Talk:
jodichromeysupergenius
Last.fm:
jodiwilldare
Twitter:
jodiwilldare

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives